Recruitment

Back to Basics: Creating a Resume that POPS!

Posted in Life, Recruitment on May 4th, 2011 by HeidiFrye – Be the first to comment

I’ve had a lot of calls lately regarding “resumes” – people are dusting ‘em off and getting ready for potential opportunities! I’ve reviewed quite a few of these high-level-over-achiever’s resumes and there seems to be a common theme….

A vast majority of the resumes I’m seeing are “responsibility oriented” vs. “achievement oriented” – they typically do not reflect the excellence or the essence of the person. Most people don’t see the problem. Let’s say you are in sales, as is your best friend, and the two of you have worked for the same set of companies your entire careers. If your resume is “responsibility oriented”, both resumes will look exactly the same (minus your name and address of course)!!! You know: cold call prospects; create proposals; generate new business; handled existing accounts; blah, blah, blah. This doesn’t feature/show the real you and it is incredibly boring!

If you really want the prospective employer to sit up and take notice of your resume….start by over-hauling/editing your resume with a “results/achievement-oriented” pen! Take the same example as above but this time list “achievements” instead of responsibilities, like: averaged 10 new Fortune 500 clients per year; stack-ranked #3 out of 148; grew the territory 110% year 1, 150% year 2, and 130% year 3 …and on and on and on. See the difference? Non-sales people complain they don’t have metrics to list. I challenge you to think outside the box! What about: mentored 3 new hires who achieved their quotas; or brought 2 new products to market resulting in $2 million in additional revenue; or scored 8.9 in Customer Satisfaction; or decreased production time/material waste/personnel turnover by 10% resulting in $50,000 in cost savings? …take your pick! It sounds different doesn’t it? Much more powerful, right? OK, so that’s the first thing. [Note: this is the most difficult part of "creating a resume that pops", it is time-consuming, requires introspection, thought, and creativity....many people give up before the start...don't be one of them!]

Secondly, here’s a perspective on the average hiring authority reading your resume…typically 30-45 seconds the first time through…30-45 SECONDS…so make the most out of it. You know the half to full-page dissertation/summary you have at the top? Often, it gets bypassed so they can get to the real stuff. The “real stuff”, the meat, is your job history/background. Do not spend more than a third, maximum, a half, of this very-precious-resume-real-estate with a summary/summary bullets. Focus on making your experience really highlight you in the best possible way with an achievement-oriented background/experience section.

Third, if your resume is vague, know you will not get a callback. Usually vagueness means something is not being said, and there isn’t enough curiosity or patience to dig in further…NEXT! By the way, I see this a lot with “Education”. By not listing the dates, companies assume things…like you are hiding something, and the assumptions are usually not in your favor. Beleive it or not the assumption they often make is that you did not actually graduate!!!

Next, Standard Format is still preferred….summary/objective/whatever-you-want-to-list-as-your-opener at the top, then Experience (with a couple sentences outlining the type of company and your main responsibility followed by BULLETS highlighting your achievements), followed by Education, and then Associations, Hobbies, etc.

Finally, going back to the fact that only 30-45 seconds is spent reading the resume – HELP THE READER READ THE STUFF YOU WANT THEM TO READ!!! Here’s an idea, go through your achievement-oriented bullets and highlight, or should I say “bold” the phrases (not the entire bullet statement) that they should focus on. The bolding will help them zip through the important stuff that shows who you really are!

One more thing…when all else fails, if you’re wondering if something does or does not belong, ask yourself the question “Who Cares?” So, (back to the sales example) the cold calling you did in 1992 – who cares? – it is a given and doesn’t offer a lot of relevance to today since you have “graduated” to other sales positions that require cold-calling.

Good luck with your re-write and your job search…make that resume POP!

Job Search Must-Haves: Matching UP in Three Critical Areas

Posted in Recruitment, Uncategorized on July 7th, 2010 by HeidiFrye – Be the first to comment

Over the years, I have worked with many professionals hoping to advance their careers, and it has been extremely interesting to see the thought process behind “the job search”. Less tenured candidates are more likely to jump at the first opportunity that sounds mildly interesting and meets their financial expectations. As candidates “mature” (I use that term ever so affectionately), they start to consider other factors – or should anyway. They get more selective regarding the requirements that most directly impact their lives: geography; travel requirements; job demands; pay, etc….and less selective about the requirements that directly impact their careers – fit, happiness, success, and growth! Especially in the current economy (understandably so, but unfortunate none-the-less), I see more and more fear-based-job-searching going on….as well as fear-based I’m-staying-in-a-job-that-doesn’t-fit-but-at-least-I-have-a-job allegiance. Candidates are less selective, which fyi, forces client companies to be more selective. Candidates are foregoing some of the most important indicators of happiness, fulfillment, performance, and growth by accepting (or staying in) jobs that do not fit .

read more »

An “Opportunity” to Discuss: Resumes; Recruiting; ….and DATING?!

Posted in Communication, Recruitment, Uncategorized on January 29th, 2010 by HeidiFrye – Be the first to comment
Recently I was invited to be a guest speaker for a college undergrad senior class. The topic was recruiting. The class was engaged and asked a lot of great questions – very fun.  I had two interesting take-aways…
  1. This “opportunity” re-affirmed my direction on experiential-learning, or action-learning. I was hoping to help the class better understand the intricacies and nuances of the recruiting process. My challenge was to deliver this talk in a meaningful, non-boring, impactful way….this was a night class, so I wasn’t sure what kind of attention span to expect!  First of all, like most people, the students thought recruiting to be merely a name-gathering exercise. It is so much more! So how was I going to convey this big topic in the time allotted?! I used my favorite “recruitment process” analogy as a basis for the exercise (see: http://www.upwordsinc.com/executivesearch-process.php) …how the steps of “the dating process” closely match up with the recruitment process.  Since these young adults are in the throes of dating, it seemed like a pretty good angle. I had the students volunteer for various roles in our little analogy drama (the lone guy got to be “the guy”). We also had a Scribe, “the female”, and “the friend”. I had the students physically act out the dating process, stopping at each point to identify the interaction (i.e. finding out if the guy is right for your friend, the blind date, the engagement, etc.). Then….we correlated the recruitment process to the dating process. They had to think…and they had to participate! I am very hopeful and confident they learned something. They got it! …and so did I!! I saw their reactions to a non-lecture-information-dumping approach – it was great.  I saw the wheels turning (they had to actually respond and interact!). Once again, this approach to learning has proved to be the way to go.  They learned, I learned. read more »